For decades, historians have debated the question of whether concepts equivalent to race and racism existed in premodern Chinese ethnic discourse. Unfortunately, this discussion has been hindered by reliance on an inadequate nineteenth-century practice of classifying identities as racial, cultural, or national. In this talk, Professor Yang proposes a new conceptual framework for analyzing imperial Chinese ethnic discourses and argue that certain discourses previously characterized as racist could be more usefully interpreted as two distinct but related traditions of foreign relations thinking that he terms “civilization-state discourse” and “Chinese supremacism.” He also argues that “structural/systemic/institutional racism”—as understood by critical race theory (CRT) scholars in terms of institutionalized, legally enforced hierarchies of ethnic inequality within a state—did not exist in periods when the “Han” Chinese majority was dominant but did exist in some periods of minority (e.g., Mongol and Manchu) rule, albeit in a form mitigated by universalistic official rhetoric.
More content from this blog
- Vermont Movement News: A Discussion with Authors of the Statement at leftrenewal.net – 20 January 2024
- Ben Wexler on the Idea of the Eternal Settler – 26 January 2025
- The Quiet Feminist Revolution in Arab Society in Israel, by Samah Salaime – 8 March 2018
- The Tragedy of the Ukrainian Working Class, by Karmína – 11 July 2022
- Why Are You Here? Sally Abed and Jess Bricker in Conversation – 25 September 2025