For decades, historians have debated the question of whether concepts equivalent to race and racism existed in premodern Chinese ethnic discourse. Unfortunately, this discussion has been hindered by reliance on an inadequate nineteenth-century practice of classifying identities as racial, cultural, or national. In this talk, Professor Yang proposes a new conceptual framework for analyzing imperial Chinese ethnic discourses and argue that certain discourses previously characterized as racist could be more usefully interpreted as two distinct but related traditions of foreign relations thinking that he terms “civilization-state discourse” and “Chinese supremacism.” He also argues that “structural/systemic/institutional racism”—as understood by critical race theory (CRT) scholars in terms of institutionalized, legally enforced hierarchies of ethnic inequality within a state—did not exist in periods when the “Han” Chinese majority was dominant but did exist in some periods of minority (e.g., Mongol and Manchu) rule, albeit in a form mitigated by universalistic official rhetoric.
More content from this blog
- Brendan McGeever, Antisemitism and the Russian Revolution, by Simon Pirani – January 2024
- Claiming Freedom in Revolution and in War: an Introduction to the Anarchist Group in Sudan, by Black Rose/Rosa Negra Anarchist Federation – 30 October 2025
- In the Camps
- The Trans Movement of Buenos Aires takes on Milei, by Jon Weman – 26 February 2025
- “Order Returns?”: Fujimorism 2.0 Adds Peru to the Right-Wing Club, by Omar Coronel – June 2026