For decades, historians have debated the question of whether concepts equivalent to race and racism existed in premodern Chinese ethnic discourse. Unfortunately, this discussion has been hindered by reliance on an inadequate nineteenth-century practice of classifying identities as racial, cultural, or national. In this talk, Professor Yang proposes a new conceptual framework for analyzing imperial Chinese ethnic discourses and argue that certain discourses previously characterized as racist could be more usefully interpreted as two distinct but related traditions of foreign relations thinking that he terms “civilization-state discourse” and “Chinese supremacism.” He also argues that “structural/systemic/institutional racism”—as understood by critical race theory (CRT) scholars in terms of institutionalized, legally enforced hierarchies of ethnic inequality within a state—did not exist in periods when the “Han” Chinese majority was dominant but did exist in some periods of minority (e.g., Mongol and Manchu) rule, albeit in a form mitigated by universalistic official rhetoric.
More content from this blog
- Left Renewal Blog Seeking Co-editors
- Labour Must Stand Firm with Ukraine, by Chris Ford – 23 January 2026
- Haftar and Hemedti: Patriots or Pawns in Trans-Saharan Business Interests?, by Musab Mohamed Ali Hassan Alnaser – 21 July 2025
- Expropriation, Exploitation, and the Neoliberal Racial Order – 7 March 2019
- The Fight for Freedom in Ukraine Is Intimately Linked to the Global Struggle Against Fascist Forces. Interview with Hanna Perekhoda – 11 February 2025
- Palestine: Lessons From History, by Martin Thomas – 31 December 2024