For decades, historians have debated the question of whether concepts equivalent to race and racism existed in premodern Chinese ethnic discourse. Unfortunately, this discussion has been hindered by reliance on an inadequate nineteenth-century practice of classifying identities as racial, cultural, or national. In this talk, Professor Yang proposes a new conceptual framework for analyzing imperial Chinese ethnic discourses and argue that certain discourses previously characterized as racist could be more usefully interpreted as two distinct but related traditions of foreign relations thinking that he terms “civilization-state discourse” and “Chinese supremacism.” He also argues that “structural/systemic/institutional racism”—as understood by critical race theory (CRT) scholars in terms of institutionalized, legally enforced hierarchies of ethnic inequality within a state—did not exist in periods when the “Han” Chinese majority was dominant but did exist in some periods of minority (e.g., Mongol and Manchu) rule, albeit in a form mitigated by universalistic official rhetoric.
More content from this blog
- How Andrew Tate and the Far Right Made Common Cause with Islamists, by Rasha Al Aqeedi and Lydia Wilson – 20 June 2023
- Marx Was No Friend of Moscow, by Rasmus Fleischer – 5 March 2026
- Solidarity with the People of Sudan, Tanzania and Cameroon, by Abahlali baseMjondolo – 6 November 2025
- Make No Mistake: ‘No Other Land’ Is a Victory for the Palestinian Struggle, by Samah Salaime – 7 March 2025
- Brazilian Elections Could Determine the Shape of US Hegemony in South America, by Joshua Collins – 28 September 2026
Except where noted otherwise, original writing and translations produced by the Left Renewal Blog Collective are published under a Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 4.0 licence. Republished and translated material remains subject to the licence and terms of its original publication.