For decades, historians have debated the question of whether concepts equivalent to race and racism existed in premodern Chinese ethnic discourse. Unfortunately, this discussion has been hindered by reliance on an inadequate nineteenth-century practice of classifying identities as racial, cultural, or national. In this talk, Professor Yang proposes a new conceptual framework for analyzing imperial Chinese ethnic discourses and argue that certain discourses previously characterized as racist could be more usefully interpreted as two distinct but related traditions of foreign relations thinking that he terms “civilization-state discourse” and “Chinese supremacism.” He also argues that “structural/systemic/institutional racism”—as understood by critical race theory (CRT) scholars in terms of institutionalized, legally enforced hierarchies of ethnic inequality within a state—did not exist in periods when the “Han” Chinese majority was dominant but did exist in some periods of minority (e.g., Mongol and Manchu) rule, albeit in a form mitigated by universalistic official rhetoric.
More content from this blog
- It Is Only a Matter of Time before the Communist Movement Reemerges in a New Historical Form. Interview with Saladdin Ahmed Bahozde – 30 July 2025
- Executions After War: The Islamic Republic Settles Accounts with Protesters, by Zamaneh Media – 7 May 2026
- The Left and the Question of Defence, by Hanna Perekhoda – 24 August 2025
- Sudan War: A Counter-Revolution Against the Corporeal and the Imaginative, by Lina Dohia – 10 April 2024
- Under Modi, the Northeast Is More United With India, but More Divided Within, by Makepeace Sitlhou – 17 April 2024
Except where noted otherwise, original writing and translations produced by the Left Renewal Blog Collective are published under a Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 4.0 licence. Republished and translated material remains subject to the licence and terms of its original publication.