Every year on May 9th, commemorative events are held in big cities across Europe, such as Vienna, Berlin, Frankfurt, and Madrid, among others, to mark “Victory Day” – a celebration of the Soviet victory in World War II. The most visible is the Immortal Regiment (“Бессмертный полк”), a procession framed as a peaceful, grassroots tribute to veterans. But despite the familiar visuals of portraits, music, and flowers, this is no neutral act of remembrance.
The Immortal Regiment has become a tool of Russian state propaganda. It glorifies war, promotes authoritarian narratives, and sanitises history. In the context of Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine, allowing this event in the centre of Vienna raises urgent questions.
The Immortal Regiment started in 2012 as a grassroots initiative in Russia to honour WWII veterans. Its original goal was to democratise war memory by focusing on families rather than state heroism. People carried photos of their relatives who fought or died in WWII, shifting the meaning of Victory Day from a military parade to personal grief. But the Russian government quickly co-opted the idea. It turned the movement into a patriotic ritual, exercising control over memory and using it to build nationalistic pride. What began as a grassroots act of remembrance is now a state-led performance used to glorify the war and justify militaristic violence.
In recent years, Immortal Regiment marches have been staged in European capitals under the guidance or outright sponsorship of Russian embassies and state-aligned groups. For example, in Vienna in 2025, the program included a celebratory concert, a march through the city centre, and a closing concert under the official patronage of the Russian Embassy. All featured artists were publicly loyal to Vladimir Putin’s regime, and speeches closely followed official propaganda lines.
On the official website, organisers ask participants to avoid using “symbols with Latin letters,” an indirect reference to the “Z” and “V” symbols that have been used by the Russian army since the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and which later became widespread symbols of state propaganda, war supporters, and the Russian far right and neo-Nazis. At the same time, organisers warn against “Ukrainian ultranationalists” and say they will surveil the event with help from Austrian police.
The message is clear: this is not a peaceful, inclusive event. It’s a state-aligned propaganda performance wrapped in the language of remembrance and “security.”
Commemoration is not neutral
Organisers claim the event has no connection to current politics. But remembrance is never apolitical, especially in authoritarian regimes that weaponise history. Russian “Victory Day” has become a tool for glorifying the state and militarism, and suppressing opposing opinions.
By staging these events abroad, the Russian government positions the USSR (and by extension, today’s Russia) as the sole liberator of Europe, while ignoring Soviet atrocities, invasions, and repression. To commemorate is not the problem. But to commemorate selectively, under the Kremlin’s direction, while Russia is waging a war, killing people in Ukraine and torturing political prisoners in Russia is not remembrance. It’s the Kremlin’s propaganda.
In Russian national discourse, World War II (or the Great Patriotic War) is the central historical myth underpinning national identity. Victory Day is treated as the most important and sacred celebration of the year, symbolising the very foundation of the modern Russian state.
Since the 2014 annexation of Crimea and escalating tensions with Ukraine, this narrative has intensified. In parallel, several post-Soviet states have created museums and research projects grounded in post-colonial perspectives, which question the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, condemn Soviet (and Russian) policies of force, and critically examine the Soviet wartime legacy.
The Kremlin has responded with laws criminalising the “denial of the Nuremberg Tribunal” and the dissemination of so-called “false information” about the USSR’s role in WWII. In this framework, historical interpretation itself becomes a matter of state security.
Vladimir Putin has framed Russia’s “moral obligation” as protecting the memory of the war. In practice, this has meant shifting the focus from acknowledging the war as a violent and traumatic event to celebrating the valour of Soviet soldiers “liberating” Europe from Nazism. This reframing marks a transition from the post-war ideal of “Never again” to the militaristic slogan “We can repeat it” (mozhem povtorit’). Public opinion has followed the state’s lead. Since 2014, surveys have shown rising approval of Joseph Stalin, growing denial of the scale of mass repression, and nostalgia for the Soviet Union’s collapse as a national tragedy. The state’s ambiguous treatment of Stalin’s legacy, combined with its neglect of collective trauma, reveals how it cherry-picks history to build a militarised and exclusionary national identity. The state selectively edits the past to legitimise the present. By controlling memory, it controls who belongs, who is an enemy, and what future is possible.
Events like the Immortal Regiment are not just for Russians living outside the country. They are soft power tools, designed to normalise Russia’s militarised nationalism in foreign cities. They frame Russia as a misunderstood saviour, not an aggressor. They build loyalty among diaspora communities and stoke suspicion toward Ukrainian voices and critics of the war.
Through concerts and marches, history is reframed. And by allowing these state-aligned events to take place, host countries risk becoming silent platforms for authoritarian messaging.
While “Victory Day” events in major European cities are presented as something for the people and by the people, in reality there is strict censorship and governmental control over the program of the event. Any critique of Putin’s regime or the Russian government is not tolerated at these events.
No oppositional voices, no anti-war activists or human rights defenders are allowed to be represented at these events. And those Russian citizens who are protesting against them are being profiled by Russian secret services, which leads to serious safety risks.
Why we must speak up
Historical memory matters. So does who controls it. The “Victory Day” celebration and Immortal Regiment in Europe may not openly promote war, but their ties to the Russian state, their surveillance tactics, and their selective memory tell a different story. In a time of war, silence becomes complicity.
Allowing this event to unfold unchallenged legitimises state-sponsored narratives that erase suffering, justify violence, and fuel aggression.
The Feminist Anti-War Resistance (FAR) is a horizontal feminist movement. In 2024 the Russian authorities declared it an “undesirable organization.”
This article first appeared on the website of the Feminist Anti-War Resistance.
More content from this blog
- Israel: A settler-colonial state? A clarification, by Ralph Leonard – 22 November 2023
- Inequality Regimes in Africa From Pre-Colonial Times to the Present, by Ewout Frankema, Michiel de Haas, Marlous van Waijenburg – 13 February 2023
- The Jargon of Decoloniality, by Neil Larsen – September 2022
- The Resettlement Plan, by Avi Amit – 3 December 2024
- Andrew Tate and the Moral Bankruptcy of Muslim Proselytization, by Rasha Al Aqeedi – 26 January 2023
Except where noted otherwise, original writing and translations produced by the Left Renewal Blog Collective are published under a Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 4.0 licence. Republished and translated material remains subject to the licence and terms of its original publication.